Validation of the joint responsibility questionnaire between genders CORGEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v16i31.4463Keywords:
Gender equality; joint responsibility; coeducation; joint responsibility questionnaire, Gender equality, Joint responsibility, Coeducation, QuestionaireAbstract
In the approach of an education for equality, one of the basic aspects of educational intervention is joint responsibility between genders. In order to analyze the level of distribution of these tasks in homes, a questionnaire on joint responsibility called CORGEN was made, which was subjected to a validation process. Subsequently, to assess internal reliability, a pilot study was conducted. It was done by expert criteria applying a modification of the Delphi method. Moriyama's rules were used for content validation. Finally, internal consistency was determined by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The datums obtained in the expert assessment pointed to the convenience of making changes to the initial proposal. The pilot study showed the convenience of making small adjustments. The content validity showed a high correlation between the items and adequacy among the proposed categories. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was equal to or greater than 0.70 in all the items. In conclusion, the CORGEN questionnaire is determined as a useful and reliable resource to analyze joint responsibility between genders.
Downloads
References
Bardón, F., Cardona, A., De Poo, D., Da Gimeno, I., González-Rodríguez, M. L., López-García, F., Sánchez-Sánchez, P., Trasancos, M. y Zafra, R. (2013). Guía de corresponsabilidad. La corresponsabilidad también se enseña. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad. http://www.inmujer.gob.es/areasTematicas/AreaEducacion/ MaterialesDidacticos/docs/GuiaCorresponsabilidad.pdf
Blasco, J., López-Padrón, A. y Mengual, S. (2010). Validación mediante método Delphi de un cuestionario para conocer las experiencias e intereses hacia las actividades acuáticas con especial atención al windsurf. Ágora, para la educación física y el deporte, 12(1), 75-96.
Cabero, J. e Infante, A. (2014). El método Delphi y su empleo en la investigación en Comunicación y Educación. EDUTEC Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 48(1), 1-16.
Chiang, M. T., Diaz-Larenas, C., Rivas, A. y Martínez-Geijo P. (2013). Validación del cuestionario estilos de enseñanza. Un instrumento para el docente de educación superior. Revista De Estilos De Aprendizaje, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v6i12.987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v6i12.987
Cohen, L. y Manion, L. (2002). Métodos de investigación cuantitativa. La Muralla.
Comisión Europea (2021). El techo de cristal en la Unión Europea. https://www.observatorioigualdadyempleo.es/el-techo-de-cristal-en-la-union-europea/
Cruz, M. (2009). El método Delphi en las investigaciones educacionales. Editorial Academia.
Del Águila, V. (2020). Hacia una igualdad efectiva. El principio de corresponsabilidad. Asuntos jurídicos e interior. http://circuloeuromediterraneo.org/principio-corresponsabilidad- igualdad-hombres-mujeres/
Gaba, M. y Salvo, I. (2016). Corresponsabilidad en el cuidado infantil y conciliación con la trayectoria laboral: Significaciones y prácticas de varones argentinos. Psicoperspectivas, 15(3), 23-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol15-Issue3-fulltext-749
Jorna, A. R., Castañeda, I. E. y Martínez-Véliz P. (2015). Construcción y validación de instrumentos para directivos de salud desde la perspectiva de género. Horizonte Sanitario. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5305205
López-Gómez, E. (2018). El Método Delphi en la investigación actual en educación: Una revisión teórica y metodológica. Educación XX1, 21(1), 17-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.20169
Ludwig, B. (1997). Predicting the future: Have you considered using the Delphi methodology? Journal of Extension, 35(5). https://archives.joe.org/joe/1997october/tt2.php
Maquillón, J., De Jorge, M., Riquelme, M. C. y García, A. (2010). Análisis de las propiedades psicométircas de los cuestionarios D.I.S.P.O. (Disciplina positiva: evaluación de la responsabilidad y corresponsabilidad familiar). International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3(1), 591-600.
Oñate, N., Ramos L. y Díaz A. (1988). Utilización del Método Delphi en la pronosticación: Una experiencia inicial. Economía Planificada, 3 (4), 9-48.
Ortega, A., Rodríguez-Soto, D. y Jiménez-Figueroa, A. (2013). Equilibrio trabajo-familia:
corresponsabilidad familiar y autoeficacia parental en trabajadores de una empresa chilena. Perspectiva Psicológica, 9(1). 55-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2013.0001.04
Prince, A. C. (2021). Perspectiva de género en el currículo oculto: catalizador de la visibilización femenina. Revista De Estilos De Aprendizaje, 14(Especial), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v14iEspecial.3454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v14iEspecial.3454
Rodríguez-Sotamayor, Y., Pardo-Fernández, A., Castañeda, I. y González-Longoria, Y. Construcción y validación del cuestionario conciliación vida laboral-familiar como factor de calidad de los servicios estomatológicos. Medisur, 18(5), 10-16.
Suberviola, I. (2012). Coeducación: un derecho y un deber del profesorado. REIFOP, Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado 15 (3), 59-63.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting the original, the author(s) declare that they are aware of and accept, in full, the privacy policy as well as the copyright of the Learning Styles Magazine.
The Learning Styles Magazine offers free and open access to its content, completely free of charge, in order to bring scientific research to its readers and society in general. All digital contents are free and open access and are published under a Creative Commons license:
Rights are granted under the Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)
The Learning Styles Magazine is an open access journal. Publication of articles or reviews in the Journal does not entitle you to any remuneration. For authors as well as readers, the journal is free Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0).
With this licence, the reproduction and dissemination of the contents of the magazine for educational, social and knowledge transmission purposes is permitted, without any profit motive in mind, provided that the source and authorship are not modified. The licence granted to Learning Styles Magazine allows the copying and distribution of the magazine's contents, as long as the authorship of the work is recognised, correctly specifying the author and the publishing entity. The work may not be used for commercial purposes, nor may it be altered, transformed or generated from this work.
The publication of articles or reviews in the Journal does not give the right to any remuneration.
The Learning Styles Journal invites the author/authors to increase the visibility and scope of their articles published by re-disseminating them in:
- Web spaces and personal networks, as well as in scientific meetings and forums
- Open institutional archives in Universities, educational repositories and Research Centres.
- Academic and scientific networks (Researchgate, Academia.edu, Plubons, etc.)
All these spaces and publications must include all the bibliographic data of the publication.