STEM and Robotics in Primary Education: a teacher's view to a classroom experience
Perspectiva da abordagem STEM e Robótica nas salas de aula do Ensino Primário, tal como vista pelos professores do 5º e 6º ano no contexto espanhol.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v18i35.5468Keywords:
STEM, educational robotics, primary education, technologyAbstract
This research aims to identify key elements of an educational project that integrates STEM and educational robotics from the perspective of teachers. The research technique used was a semi-structured interview, following a flexible question guide. A content analysis was conducted, employing a system of categories developed both deductively and inductively. In relation to the coded document variables, the frequencies and respective percentages correspond to a total of 184 coded segments. The category "Evaluation of the project as a didactic proposal" showed a predominance with 78 segments, followed by "Impact of the project on attitudes towards science and mathematics" with 56 coded fragments.
Downloads
References
Ahn, H. y Choi, Y. (2015). Analysis on the effects of the augmented reality-based steam program on education. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 92(1), 125-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/astl.2015.92.26
Akerson, V.L., Burgess, A., Gerber, A., Guo, M., Khan, T.A. y Newman, S. (2018). Disentangling the meaning of STEM: Implications for science education and science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/1046560X.2018.1435063
Bardin, L. (2002). Análisis de contenido. Akal
Blanco-López, A., Martínez-Peña, B. y Jiménez-Liso, M.R. (2018). ¿Puede la investigación iluminar el cambio educativo? Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica, 2(2), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.2018.2.2.4612
Chai, S. y Chun, S. (2015). The effects of STEAM-based programming education with robot on creativity and character of elementary school students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(2), 159-166.
Chen, G.A. y Buell, J.Y. (2018). Of models and myths: Asian (Americans) in STEM and the neoliberal racial project. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(5), 607-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1377170
Cohen, L. y Manion, L. (2002). Métodos de investigación educativa. La Muralla.
Couso, D. (2017). Per a qué stem a STEAM? Definit lälfabetización STEAM per tothom i amb valors. Ciencia. Revista del Professorar de Ciencias dÍnfantil Primari i Secundaria, 34(7), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ciencies.403
Dare, E.A., Ellis, J.A. y Roehrig, G.H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z
Ejiwale, J. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 63-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/edulearn. v7i2.220
Ferrada, C., Puraivan, E., Silva, F., y Díaz Levicoy, D. (2021) ‘Robótica aplicada al aula en Educación Primaria: un caso en el contexto español’, Sociología y Tecnociencia, 11(2), pp. 240–259. https://doi.org/10.24197/st.Extra_2.2021.240-259
Ferrada, C., Díaz Levicoy, D., & Carrillo Rosúa, F. (2021). Integración de las actividades STEM en libros de texto. Revista Fuentes, 23(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.v23.i1.8878
Jaipal-Jamani, K. y Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175-192.
Kim, C., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P. y Thai, C. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14-31.
Lin, P., Chai, C. y Jong, M.-Y. (2021). A study of disposition, engagement, efficacy, and vitality of teachers in designing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 661631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661631
Merriam, S. y Tisdell, E. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M. y Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168.
National Research Council (2014). STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612
Ortiz, A., Bos, B. y Smith, S. (2015). The Power of Educational Robotics as an Integrated STEM Learning Experience in Teacher Preparation Programs. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(5), 42-47.
Perales-Palacios, F.J. y Aguilera, D. (2020). Ciencia-Tecnología-Sociedad vs. STEM: ¿evolución, revolución o disyunción? Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica, 4(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.2020.4.1.5826
Reinking, A. y Martin, B. (2018). The gender gap in STEM fields: Theories, movements, and ideas to engage girls in STEM. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 148-153. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.271
Román-Graván, P., Hervás-Gómez, C. y Guisado-Lizar, J.L. (2017). Experiencia de innovación educativa con robótica en la Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación de la Universidad de Sevilla (España). En J. Ruiz-Palmero, J. Sánchez-Rodríguez y E. Sánchez-Rivas (Eds.), Innovación docente y uso de las TIC en educación (pp. 1-16). UMA Editorial.
Seckel, M.J., Breda, A., Font, V. y Vásquez, C. (2021). Primary School Teachers’ Conceptions about the Use of Robotics in Mathematics. Mathematics, 9(24), 3186. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243186
Sierra y Arizmendiarrieta, B., Méndez-Giménez, A. y Mañana-Rodríguez, J. (2013). La programación por competencias básicas: hacia un cambio metodológico interdisciplinar. Revista Complutense de Educación, 24(1), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2013.v24.n1.41196
Toma, R.B. y Retana-Alvarado, D.A. (2021). Mejora de las concepciones de maestros en formación de la educación STEM. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 87(1), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie8714538
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting the original, the author(s) declare that they are aware of and accept, in full, the privacy policy as well as the copyright of the Learning Styles Magazine.
The Learning Styles Magazine offers free and open access to its content, completely free of charge, in order to bring scientific research to its readers and society in general. All digital contents are free and open access and are published under a Creative Commons license:
Rights are granted under the Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)
The Learning Styles Magazine is an open access journal. Publication of articles or reviews in the Journal does not entitle you to any remuneration. For authors as well as readers, the journal is free Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0).
With this licence, the reproduction and dissemination of the contents of the magazine for educational, social and knowledge transmission purposes is permitted, without any profit motive in mind, provided that the source and authorship are not modified. The licence granted to Learning Styles Magazine allows the copying and distribution of the magazine's contents, as long as the authorship of the work is recognised, correctly specifying the author and the publishing entity. The work may not be used for commercial purposes, nor may it be altered, transformed or generated from this work.
The publication of articles or reviews in the Journal does not give the right to any remuneration.
The Learning Styles Journal invites the author/authors to increase the visibility and scope of their articles published by re-disseminating them in:
- Web spaces and personal networks, as well as in scientific meetings and forums
- Open institutional archives in Universities, educational repositories and Research Centres.
- Academic and scientific networks (Researchgate, Academia.edu, Plubons, etc.)
All these spaces and publications must include all the bibliographic data of the publication.