ESTILOS DE APRENDIZAJE Y AUTOCONCEPTO ACADÉMICO EN LOS ALUMNOS DE BACHILLERATO: DIFERENCIAS ENTRE MODALIDADES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55777/rea.v6i11.974Keywords:
Estilo de Aprendizaje, Autoconcepto Académico, Ciclo de Aprendizaje, Bachillerato, ModalidadesAbstract
Resumen
Esta investigación analiza si la elección de la modalidad de bachillerato elegida por el alumno mantiene relación con sus estrategias de aprendizaje. Estudiamos si entre alumnos de distintas modalidades se aprecian diferencias en sus estilos de aprendizaje y su autoconcepto académico. Para el estudio tomamos como referencia los alumnos de 1º de Bachillerato de dos modalidades -Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales vs Ciencias y Tecnología- en el IES Jorge Manrique de Palencia (España). Los resultados indican que los alumnos de las dos modalidades obtienen puntuaciones coincidentes en el estilo pragmático y reflexivo pero dispares en teórico y, sobre todo, en activo. Las diferencias más notables se deben a la jerarquía que se establece entre las fases del ciclo de aprendizaje, por ello van a mostrar unas preferencias metodológicas distintas. Respecto al autoconcepto académico, los resultados apuntan que los alumnos muestran un elevado autoconcepto, sobre todo los de humanidades.
LEARNING STYLES AND ACADEMIC SELF-CONCEPT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MODALITIES OF BACHILLERATO
Abstract
We explore whether bachillerato students evidence any differences in their learning styles -active, reflexive, theoretical and pragmatic- and in the academic self-concept depending on the modality of studies they opt for. This study was applied to students from bachillerato in the IES “Jorge Manrique” of the Palencia (Spain). Findings indicate that the most notable differences are due to the hierarchy which is established between the phases at this learning cycle, such that whereas the theoretical style predominated as the least developed amongst students studying humanities, amongst those studying sciences the reflexive style emerged as the most developed. As regards academic self-concept, findings indicate that students evidence a high academic self-concept, greater even than the perceived academic self-concept they perceive from their parents. Findings also revealed that humanities students showed significantly higher self-concept levels than science students.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting the original, the author(s) declare that they are aware of and accept, in full, the privacy policy as well as the copyright of the Learning Styles Magazine.
The Learning Styles Magazine offers free and open access to its content, completely free of charge, in order to bring scientific research to its readers and society in general. All digital contents are free and open access and are published under a Creative Commons license:
Rights are granted under the Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0)
The Learning Styles Magazine is an open access journal. Publication of articles or reviews in the Journal does not entitle you to any remuneration. For authors as well as readers, the journal is free Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0).
With this licence, the reproduction and dissemination of the contents of the magazine for educational, social and knowledge transmission purposes is permitted, without any profit motive in mind, provided that the source and authorship are not modified. The licence granted to Learning Styles Magazine allows the copying and distribution of the magazine's contents, as long as the authorship of the work is recognised, correctly specifying the author and the publishing entity. The work may not be used for commercial purposes, nor may it be altered, transformed or generated from this work.
The publication of articles or reviews in the Journal does not give the right to any remuneration.
The Learning Styles Journal invites the author/authors to increase the visibility and scope of their articles published by re-disseminating them in:
- Web spaces and personal networks, as well as in scientific meetings and forums
- Open institutional archives in Universities, educational repositories and Research Centres.
- Academic and scientific networks (Researchgate, Academia.edu, Plubons, etc.)
All these spaces and publications must include all the bibliographic data of the publication.